Could a real intelligence officer live like James Bond? The movies make espionage look like a career of gunfights, explosions, gadgets, fast cars, alcohol, and impossible escapes. Real intelligence work and the limits of the human body tell a very different story.
Editorial Note
This article examines fictional spy movies through science, medicine, publicly available information about intelligence work, and general historical context. It does not provide instructions for espionage, surveillance, weapons use, or covert operations. James Bond is a fictional character associated with Ian Fleming’s novels and the long-running film franchise; references here are used for educational commentary and analysis.
Real intelligence organizations necessarily keep significant parts of their operations secret. This article therefore relies only on publicly available information from organizations including the United Kingdom’s Secret Intelligence Service, commonly known as MI6, the CIA, MI5, government legislation, and public health and scientific agencies. The purpose is not to claim that dangerous intelligence operations never happen, but to compare the familiar super-spy fantasy with what is known about real intelligence careers, physics, medicine, and human performance.
James Bond has survived gunfights, explosions, car wrecks, falls, drownings, torture, extreme cold, repeated fistfights, and enough blows to the head to make a neurologist uncomfortable. Afterward, he often straightens his suit, orders a drink, and continues the mission.
That is part of the fantasy. Bond is presented as almost impossibly competent: he can shoot, drive, fight, gamble, charm, improvise, operate specialized technology, understand villains almost instantly, and survive physical punishment that would end most careers.
The problem is not that every individual Bond escape is necessarily impossible. People survive extraordinary accidents, traumatic injuries, dangerous environments, and events that seem almost unbelievable.
The problem is repetition.
A real human being could not repeatedly experience Bond-level crashes, explosions, concussions, gunfire, sleep deprivation, alcohol consumption, and physical trauma while continuing to perform at an elite level without consequences. The body does not reset when the mission ends.
That may be Bond’s most unrealistic superpower.
It is not his aim, his charm, or even his driving.
It is his ability to recover.
A Real James Bond Probably Would Not Be Called an “Agent”
Spy fiction often uses the words spy, agent, and intelligence officer as though they mean the same thing. Real intelligence terminology can be quite different.
MI6 publicly describes many of its employees in operational roles as Intelligence Officers. Those officers may, among other responsibilities, recruit and work with agents who can provide information. The CIA has similarly used terminology in which operations or case officers identify, recruit, develop, and manage human sources.
That creates an amusing reversal of the movie vocabulary. In many intelligence contexts, the government employee is the officer, while the “agent” may be the person supplying information.
Terminology varies between organizations and countries, but the distinction reveals something important about real espionage. Intelligence collection is not necessarily about sending one extraordinary government employee into a building to personally steal every secret.
A large part of human intelligence revolves around relationships. Officers may need to identify people with access to useful information, build trust, evaluate their motivations, determine whether they are reliable, and work with colleagues who analyze what those sources provide.
That sounds less dramatic than escaping from a burning building.
It may also be much more useful.
Real Intelligence Work Is More Teamwork Than Superhero Mission
Bond often functions like an entire intelligence service compressed into one person. He conducts surveillance, handles weapons, obtains information, operates specialized vehicles, evaluates geopolitical threats, infiltrates secure locations, uses advanced technology, and sometimes appears to make decisions with international consequences almost entirely on his own.
Real intelligence organizations are structured very differently. MI6 publicly describes careers involving intelligence officers, technical specialists, operational planners, and other professionals. The CIA advertises roles spanning intelligence collection, analysis, science, technology, engineering, languages, cyber work, data, and other specialties.
MI5 likewise describes intelligence collection and investigative work involving different personnel and different methods. One person does not need to be the best linguist, analyst, engineer, surveillance specialist, driver, cyber expert, source handler, and geopolitical strategist simultaneously because organizations can build teams containing those capabilities.
That is one of the biggest differences between spy fiction and intelligence work. Movies need a central character, so one person is expected to perform almost everything. Real organizations can distribute complicated tasks among people who specialize in different areas.
Exceptional generalists certainly exist, and highly trained professionals may become skilled across several fields. But the more complicated an operation becomes, the less realistic it is to expect one person to perform every role at an elite level.
The Best Spy Might Be Someone Nobody Remembers
Bond also has an unusual problem for someone whose profession depends on secrecy: he is extremely memorable.
He enters luxury hotels and casinos, attends high-profile events, drives distinctive vehicles, confronts important adversaries face-to-face, and frequently leaves behind wrecked buildings, damaged cars, witnesses, security footage, and very memorable stories.
That makes excellent entertainment, but it creates an obvious problem for clandestine work.
The CIA publicly states that officers in its Directorate of Operations may live and work undercover. MI6 describes its mission as collecting foreign intelligence overseas to protect UK interests. In those environments, avoiding attention may matter as much as demonstrating competence.
A successful intelligence officer may not need to be the most interesting person in the room. Depending on the assignment, being ordinary, forgettable, patient, and difficult to notice could be a significant advantage.
Modern technology makes the Bond problem even larger. International travel can leave passport and border records. Hotels may have cameras. Phones generate data. Financial transactions create records. Facial recognition and biometric systems continue to develop. Social media can place people at particular locations, sometimes without their knowledge.
The fictional Bond repeatedly appears near extraordinary international incidents while somehow remaining a useful secret operative afterward. A real officer whose face became associated with explosions, assassinations, destroyed vehicles, casinos, and international emergencies might find future clandestine assignments increasingly difficult.
Movies need audiences to remember Bond.
A real intelligence professional may prefer that nobody does.
Gunfights Would Often Mean the Secret Operation Has Failed
Bond solves a remarkable number of intelligence problems with gunfire.
From an intelligence perspective, that creates a contradiction. If the purpose of an operation is to obtain information without attracting attention, a prolonged gun battle is strong evidence that the operation is no longer particularly secret.
Gunfire attracts witnesses and law enforcement. Violence leaves physical evidence. Injuries require treatment. Destroyed property generates investigations. Dead or captured participants can create new intelligence opportunities for adversaries. Every additional person who sees the confrontation increases the chance that identities, vehicles, methods, and locations become known.
Real intelligence services can operate in dangerous environments, and national-security operations can certainly involve violence. The unrealistic part is treating repeated public violence as the normal measure of professional success.
Information is frequently more valuable than spectacle. Someone who knows how a hostile organization operates may be more useful alive, unaware that investigators are watching, or willing to provide information than dead after a dramatic shootout.
Bond's method often succeeds because the story ends shortly afterward.
A real service would still have to deal with everything he left behind.
Suppressors Do Not Turn Guns Into Whispering Devices
Spy movies have helped create one of cinema's most durable myths: attach a suppressor to a firearm and it becomes almost silent.
Suppressors can significantly reduce firearm noise, but they do not normally turn a gunshot into the tiny whisper audiences often hear in movies. Firearm noise comes from more than one source, and reducing muzzle blast does not eliminate every sound created when the weapon is fired.
Research published through the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has found that suppressors can reduce noise exposure while still leaving shooters at risk of harmful sound levels. Hearing protection may therefore remain important even when a suppressor is used.
That introduces another problem for a decades-long Bond career. Frequent exposure to gunfire and explosions could contribute to cumulative hearing damage.
Movies rarely address what Bond's hearing would be like after years of close-range gunfire, explosions, engines, helicopters, and crashes. Even when none of those events kills him, repeated high-intensity noise does not simply disappear from his medical history.
Bond's Real Superpower Would Be Surviving Repeated Head Injuries
The greatest biological problem with the Bond lifestyle may be what repeatedly happens to his brain.
Action heroes are punched, struck with objects, thrown against walls, involved in crashes, blasted across rooms, and knocked unconscious with remarkable frequency. Movies often treat this as temporary inconvenience. The character wakes up, rubs his head, and continues.
Medicine treats those events much more seriously.
A concussion is a form of traumatic brain injury that can result from a direct impact or from rapid movement of the brain inside the skull. Symptoms may affect memory, concentration, balance, mood, sleep, reaction time, and other functions. Recovery can take days, weeks, or longer depending on the injury and the individual.
Repeated head impacts create additional concern because the brain is not necessarily starting from a perfect baseline after every incident. A real person who experienced multiple serious blows, explosions, crashes, and episodes of unconsciousness would require medical evaluation and recovery time.
That matters especially for an intelligence professional. Attention, judgment, memory, reaction time, emotional regulation, and rapid decision-making are precisely the abilities repeated brain injuries can compromise.
Movie Bond survives head trauma physically.
The more difficult question is whether he could continue thinking like Bond afterward.
Being “Knocked Out” Is Not a Safe Off Switch
Spy and action movies frequently treat unconsciousness as though the human brain has a temporary sleep button. Someone is struck on the head, becomes unconscious for several minutes, wakes up later, and appears mostly normal.
That is not a safe assumption.
Loss or alteration of consciousness after trauma can indicate brain injury. The same impact capable of making someone unconscious can produce bleeding, swelling, concussion, skull injury, or other complications.
There is therefore no reliable movie-style technique for rendering another person unconscious for a convenient amount of time without creating medical risk.
This makes both sides of the Bond formula unrealistic. Bond repeatedly knocks adversaries unconscious without apparently causing catastrophic brain injuries, and he repeatedly experiences similar trauma himself without requiring extended neurological recovery.
In reality, the appropriate response to someone losing consciousness after a major blow would not usually be waiting for the plot to resume.
It would be concern about a potentially significant head injury.
Explosions and Crashes Would Leave More Than Dramatic Bruises
Action movies frequently depict explosions as giant sources of wind. The blast launches the hero across a room, he lands hard, looks disoriented, and continues running.
Real explosions can injure people in several ways. Blast pressure can damage organs. Flying debris can create penetrating injuries. Intense noise can damage hearing. Blast winds can throw a person into walls, vehicles, or the ground, causing fractures and blunt-force trauma. The brain can also be injured even when there is no obvious external wound.
The same basic problem appears in Bond's vehicle crashes. Modern cars can protect occupants through seat belts, airbags, structural engineering, and crumple zones, but those technologies reduce forces rather than making physics disappear. A person inside a vehicle still experiences acceleration, deceleration, rotation, and impact.
A single dramatic crash can be survivable. People survive extraordinary collisions every day, sometimes with remarkably few injuries.
The difficulty is imagining someone repeatedly experiencing high-speed crashes, large explosions, falls, and blunt-force impacts while remaining physically capable of continuing demanding operational work.
The accumulating damage is the part fiction tends to erase.
Bond's Drinking Would Work Against the Skills Bond Needs
The martini is part of Bond's identity, but alcohol creates another problem for the super-spy fantasy.
Alcohol can affect reaction time, judgment, coordination, attention, and other aspects of cognitive and physical performance. Those are precisely the abilities Bond supposedly needs at an exceptional level.
High-speed driving depends on rapid reactions and accurate judgment. Shooting depends on coordination. Recognizing danger depends on attention. Reading another person's behavior requires perception and decision-making. Remembering small details matters in intelligence collection.
Regularly combining demanding operational work with alcohol therefore creates a contradiction. The character is expected to perform like an elite athlete, driver, intelligence officer, and marksman while frequently consuming a substance known to impair many of those capabilities.
The effect becomes even more questionable when alcohol is combined with injuries, jet lag, stress, poor nutrition, and insufficient sleep.
Bond may be able to order the perfect drink.
His nervous system still has to metabolize it.
Sleep Deprivation Would Eventually Win
Bond's schedule may be almost as unrealistic as his injuries.
He flies internationally, attends events late into the night, conducts surveillance, investigates threats, fights, drinks, drives, escapes capture, and then appears ready for another mission with little indication that ordinary human sleep requirements apply to him.
Sleep deprivation affects attention, reaction time, decision-making, memory, emotional regulation, and other aspects of cognitive performance. Those effects are particularly important in jobs where small mistakes can have large consequences.
Training can improve someone's ability to function under fatigue, and professionals in military, emergency, intelligence, aviation, and medical settings sometimes have to perform under difficult sleep conditions. That does not remove the biological need for sleep.
Eventually, accumulated sleep loss has to be repaid through recovery.
For Bond, the combination of time-zone changes, physical trauma, alcohol, stress, and irregular sleep would likely make maintaining elite cognitive performance increasingly difficult.
A realistic spy movie might therefore include something audiences rarely see.
Eight uninterrupted hours of sleep.
The Gadgets Would Have to Obey Engineering Too
Bond's gadgets are entertaining because they tend to solve exactly the problem he encounters. The device is usually tiny enough to conceal, powerful enough to save his life, durable enough to survive abuse, and simple enough to use during an emergency.
Real engineering involves trade-offs.
A small device still requires energy. Greater power generally requires greater energy storage, which adds weight and volume. Communications devices face limitations involving antennas, range, interference, and signal conditions. Cameras require sensors and optics. Computers produce heat. Batteries discharge. Mechanical systems require components capable of surviving the forces placed on them.
None of this means sophisticated intelligence technology is fictional. MI6 openly advertises technical careers, while the CIA recruits engineers, scientists, data specialists, and other technical professionals. Intelligence agencies have strong incentives to develop advanced tools.
The unrealistic part is expecting every device to be simultaneously miniature, extraordinarily powerful, nearly indestructible, perfectly reliable, and available at exactly the correct moment.
Real engineers have to decide which compromises are acceptable.
Movie engineers have the advantage of knowing what the next scene requires.
The “License to Kill” Is Not a Personal Immunity Card
One of the most famous elements of the Bond mythology is his fictional “00” status and supposed license to kill.
Real intelligence services operate within legal and governmental frameworks rather than handing individual officers unlimited personal authority to kill anyone they consider a threat. MI6 publicly states that it operates under UK law and is subject to oversight.
The Intelligence Services Act 1994 does contain provisions relating to government authorization for certain actions abroad in connection with intelligence functions. Those authorities are legally and institutionally much more complicated than the movie concept of an individual officer carrying a permanent personal permission slip.
That distinction matters because intelligence officers act on behalf of states and organizations. Questions involving the use of force can involve national law, international law, authorization, oversight, policy, necessity, and accountability.
Bond turns all of those questions into a simple character trait.
He has a number.
Therefore, the story treats him as authorized.
Real government power is more complicated than that.
Seduction Would Be a Counterintelligence Risk as Well as a Movie Trope
Bond's romantic relationships are often portrayed as another operational tool. Charm supposedly produces access, information, cooperation, and sometimes immediate trust.
Real human intelligence depends heavily on relationships, but those relationships are considerably more complicated than the Bond formula suggests.
A source can have personal motivations, political beliefs, financial pressures, fears, divided loyalties, or reasons to provide false information. Intelligence officers must evaluate both the information and the person providing it.
Romantic or sexual relationships can introduce another layer of risk. Emotional involvement can complicate judgment, create vulnerabilities, expose identities, create opportunities for manipulation, and make it harder to determine whether someone is cooperating sincerely.
History contains examples of intelligence operations involving intimacy and relationships, so the concept is not purely fictional. What movies exaggerate is the idea that seduction functions as an almost universal shortcut to trustworthy intelligence.
Getting someone to talk is only one part of the problem.
Knowing whether to believe them is another.
Modern Technology Would Help Bond—and Make Hiding Much Harder
Today's intelligence environment provides tools Ian Fleming could barely have imagined when Bond first appeared in the 1950s.
Intelligence organizations now operate in a world of satellites, advanced sensors, encrypted communications, cyber operations, artificial intelligence, enormous datasets, digital surveillance, and sophisticated analytical tools. The CIA openly recruits specialists in artificial intelligence, data science, engineering, and technology, while MI6 similarly advertises technical careers.
Those developments could make a modern intelligence officer considerably more capable.
They also create new vulnerabilities.
The same digital environment that helps one intelligence service identify a target can help another identify an officer. Phones, cameras, databases, biometrics, travel records, social media, financial systems, and network activity can create traces that did not exist during earlier periods of espionage.
That makes the idea of the celebrity secret agent increasingly contradictory. The more Bond becomes publicly associated with extraordinary events, the more difficult it becomes to imagine him continuing to travel internationally under effective cover.
Modern technology does not make espionage disappear.
It makes discretion and organizational support even more important.
Could Someone Actually Be as Skilled as Bond?
The answer becomes more interesting here because parts of Bond are absolutely plausible.
A real intelligence officer could be highly intelligent, physically fit, multilingual, persuasive, observant, technically competent, calm under pressure, and comfortable operating internationally. People in intelligence, military service, law enforcement, diplomacy, aviation, medicine, engineering, and other demanding professions sometimes develop combinations of abilities that would seem extraordinary to people outside those fields.
Someone could also become highly proficient in several areas through extensive training and experience.
The unrealistic part is not excellence.
It is excellence without consequences or limitations.
An outstanding driver can still be injured in a crash. A highly trained fighter can still suffer a concussion. A skilled shooter can still damage hearing. An experienced intelligence officer can still become exhausted. Someone with excellent judgment can still make worse decisions after severe sleep deprivation or alcohol consumption.
Training raises human performance.
It does not remove human biology.
That is what makes Bond's recovery more unrealistic than almost any individual skill he possesses.
What Would a Realistic James Bond Look Like?
A scientifically and professionally plausible Bond would probably be less spectacular and more difficult to notice.
He might spend considerably more time listening than fighting. Building relationships, understanding motivations, evaluating information, communicating across cultures, and deciding whom to trust could matter more than winning a fistfight.
He would depend heavily on specialists because nobody is an expert in everything. Analysts might help interpret intelligence. Engineers and technical personnel could develop equipment. Language specialists might assist with communication. Other officers could contribute expertise he does not possess.
He would also have strong incentives to avoid unnecessary violence. Violence attracts attention, creates evidence, causes injuries, and can destroy relationships or information sources. Successfully leaving a meeting without anyone realizing an intelligence exchange took place might be much more valuable than surviving a spectacular gunfight afterward.
A realistic Bond would take medical recovery seriously as well. A significant head injury could remove him from operational work temporarily. A major explosion could require hospitalization. Hearing protection would matter. Sleep would matter. Alcohol would be something to manage rather than part of an elite-performance routine.
The result would still be a demanding profession.
It simply would not look much like an action movie.
New To Education Analysis: Bond's Real Superpower Is Recovery
James Bond works as a fictional character because he combines several fantasies into one person. He is the detective who always notices the clue, the athlete who never becomes exhausted, the soldier who survives every battle, the diplomat who enters elite social circles, the driver who controls any vehicle, and the intelligence officer who can solve geopolitical problems personally.
Science exposes the hidden requirement holding all of those abilities together.
Recovery.
The body keeps records even when the movie franchise does not. A concussion does not disappear because the next mission starts. Hearing damage does not reset because the gunfight ended. A damaged joint does not become new again when the credits roll. Alcohol still affects performance, and the brain still requires sleep.
That does not make Bond foolish entertainment. In many ways, it explains why the character is entertaining. Fiction allows audiences to imagine what a person could do if human limits were temporarily suspended.
The intelligence side reveals another interesting contradiction. Bond proves his effectiveness by being noticed. He drives the remarkable car, enters the glamorous room, confronts the villain personally, survives the explosion, and leaves behind a story people would remember.
Real clandestine work can reward almost the opposite qualities. The officer who quietly obtains valuable information without attracting attention may have accomplished far more than someone who needed a helicopter chase to achieve the same result.
That difference captures the central problem with the super-spy fantasy.
Bond is designed to be unforgettable.
A successful real spy may benefit from being forgotten.
Key Takeaways
A person with some James Bond-like qualities could absolutely exist. Intelligence professionals can work overseas, operate under cover, recruit human sources, develop specialized skills, use sophisticated technology, and sometimes face dangerous situations. The existence of real intelligence officers is not the unrealistic part of the story.
The problem is the combination of nearly every specialized ability in one person and the repeated physical punishment that person absorbs without lasting consequences. Concussions, blast exposure, vehicle crashes, gunfire, sleep deprivation, alcohol, and cumulative musculoskeletal injuries would eventually reduce performance rather than leave the person permanently ready for another mission.
Real intelligence work is also much more collaborative than the Bond formula suggests. Public descriptions from intelligence organizations show operations personnel, analysts, technical specialists, investigators, linguists, scientists, engineers, and other professionals contributing different expertise.
Bond's most unrealistic ability may therefore be his recovery. Fiction allows him to absorb extraordinary damage and effectively return to baseline for another story. Human biology does not provide the same reset button.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do people like James Bond actually work for MI6?
MI6 employs intelligence officers who may work in operational roles in the United Kingdom and overseas. Its public career information describes responsibilities that can include recruiting agents and supporting technical operations. That is genuine intelligence work, but the organization describes a professional service involving many different roles rather than a single all-purpose super spy.
Do real spies have a “license to kill”?
Not in the simple personal sense portrayed by Bond. British intelligence organizations operate under legislation, governmental authority, policies, and oversight. The Intelligence Services Act 1994 contains provisions concerning authorized activities abroad, but that is substantially different from giving an individual officer unlimited personal permission to kill.
Are real gun suppressors silent?
No. Suppressors can significantly reduce firearm noise, but suppressed gunfire can still be loud enough to pose a hearing risk. The nearly silent sound common in spy movies greatly exaggerates what a suppressor normally accomplishes.
Could a person survive as many injuries as James Bond?
Individual survival is possible in many extraordinary circumstances, so there is no simple rule that every Bond injury would be fatal. The larger problem is cumulative trauma. Repeated concussions, explosions, crashes, falls, and other injuries would make maintaining elite physical and cognitive performance increasingly difficult.
Final Thoughts
James Bond is not unrealistic because intelligence officers, covert operations, sophisticated technology, or dangerous missions do not exist. They do.
The fantasy comes from putting almost all of those capabilities into one person and then giving that person a body that seems largely immune to cumulative consequences.
A real intelligence officer still has a brain that can be concussed, ears that can be damaged, bones that can break, muscles that become fatigued, and a nervous system that requires sleep. Training can improve human performance enormously, but training does not repeal physiology.
Real intelligence work also rewards qualities that movies struggle to make exciting. Patience matters. Teamwork matters. Judgment matters. Relationships matter. Listening matters. Avoiding unnecessary attention can matter more than winning the fight after attracting it.
A mission completed without anyone realizing something important happened may be a greater intelligence success than one involving a destroyed sports car, three explosions, and a helicopter chase.
So could someone resemble James Bond?
In pieces, certainly.
A person could be intelligent, charismatic, physically capable, multilingual, technically skilled, and unusually effective under pressure. Real intelligence officers can work overseas and undercover, and some undoubtedly experience situations far outside ordinary professional life.
The complete Bond package is where reality gives way to entertainment. Constant violence, impossible recoveries, endless energy, frequent drinking, extraordinary gadgets, extreme driving, and the ability to remain a secret while repeatedly becoming the center of international incidents would eventually collide with biology, physics, and professional reality.
The world's most famous fictional spy probably would not need a supervillain to end his career.
After enough missions, ordinary human limitations might do it first.
Support New To Education
New To Education publishes science explainers, educational reporting, research analysis, and articles that use popular culture and familiar questions to make complicated ideas easier to understand.
https://www.newtoeducation.com/
Related Articles
Why Having Superpowers Would Be Worse Than You Think
https://www.newtoeducation.com/view-blog/why-having-superpowers-would-be-worse-than-you-think-6a6c931b7ce6e
Sources
Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) — Intelligence Officers
https://www.sis.gov.uk/careers/intelligence-officers/
Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) — Careers
https://www.sis.gov.uk/careers/
Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) — Oversight and Law
https://www.sis.gov.uk/about-us/oversight-and-law/
Central Intelligence Agency — Directorate of Operations
https://www.cia.gov/about/organization/directorate-of-operations/
Central Intelligence Agency — Careers
https://www.cia.gov/careers/
Central Intelligence Agency — Take a Peek Inside CIA's Directorate of Operations
https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/take-a-peek-inside-cias-directorate-of-operations/
MI5 — Intelligence Collection
https://www.mi5.gov.uk/careers/opportunities/intelligence-collection
MI5 — Investigations
https://www.mi5.gov.uk/careers/opportunities/investigations
UK Legislation — Intelligence Services Act 1994
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/13/contents
UK Legislation — Intelligence Services Act 1994, Section 7
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1994/13/section/7
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke — Traumatic Brain Injury
https://www.ninds.nih.gov/health-information/disorders/traumatic-brain-injury-tbi
National Institutes of Health — Effects of Repeated Head Trauma in Young Athletes
https://www.nih.gov/news-events/nih-research-matters/effects-repeated-head-trauma-young-athletes
CDC/NIOSH — The Reduction of Gunshot Noise and Auditory Risk Through the Use of Firearm Suppressors
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/111710
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism — Alcohol's Effects on the Body
https://www.niaaa.nih.gov/alcohols-effects-health/alcohols-effects-body
CDC/NIOSH — Sleep Deprivation
https://archive.cdc.gov/www_cdc_gov/niosh/emres/longhourstraining/sleepdeprivation.html
