Military researchers have explored exosuits, neurotechnology, biotechnology, advanced armor, performance training, and human-machine teaming. Yet biological limits, safety risks, power demands, ethics, cost, and battlefield realities continue to prevent the creation of fictional super soldiers.
Editorial Note
This article uses the phrase “super soldiers” to describe fictional or dramatically enhanced military personnel who possess capabilities beyond normal human limits.
Military organizations openly research human performance, protective equipment, neurotechnology, biotechnology, medical recovery, artificial intelligence, and human-machine integration. Most publicly documented programs focus on reducing injuries, improving readiness, increasing protection, accelerating training, or helping personnel interact more effectively with machines.
There is no credible public evidence that any military has created an army of genetically engineered, invulnerable, or comic-book-style soldiers. Many of the technologies discussed in this article remain experimental, were developed through completed research programs, or have not progressed into widespread operational use.
Militaries Already Enhance Their Personnel
The military has always attempted to improve human performance.
Training, nutrition, medical care, protective clothing, weapons, communications, and transportation all allow service members to accomplish tasks that would be difficult or impossible without institutional support.
Modern military enhancement continues that tradition through more advanced tools.
The U.S. Army’s Holistic Health and Fitness system addresses physical, mental, nutritional, sleep, and spiritual readiness. The objective is not to create superhuman troops. It is to improve readiness, preserve combat power, reduce preventable injuries, and help soldiers perform consistently across demanding environments.
Defense research has also examined lightweight wearable support systems, advanced armor, neural interfaces, accelerated training, robotics, artificial intelligence, and medical technologies.
In that limited sense, military personnel are already enhanced.
A modern service member equipped with night vision, encrypted communications, advanced body armor, satellite navigation, drones, trauma medicine, and digital intelligence possesses capabilities that would have appeared almost supernatural to soldiers from earlier centuries.
The difference is that these capabilities come primarily from equipment, training, organization, and information—not from turning the human body into something biologically superhuman.
Fiction Combines Too Many Enhancements Into One Person
Fictional super soldiers are usually stronger, faster, more intelligent, more durable, less vulnerable to pain, resistant to disease, and capable of recovering quickly from major injuries.
Each of those abilities depends on different biological systems.
Strength involves muscles, nerves, bones, tendons, joints, hormones, oxygen delivery, and energy production. Speed depends on muscle composition, reaction time, coordination, balance, and body structure.
Endurance requires efficient circulation, breathing, temperature control, hydration, energy storage, and recovery.
Intelligence and judgment depend on enormously complicated brain processes shaped by genetics, development, education, sleep, experience, stress, and environment.
Improving one ability can also weaken another.
Increasing muscle mass may improve strength, but it adds body weight, raises energy requirements, increases heat production, and places additional stress on joints and the cardiovascular system.
Reducing fear could make someone more willing to enter danger, but it could also damage judgment and eliminate caution that is necessary for survival.
A true super soldier would require many interconnected systems to improve simultaneously without creating dangerous side effects.
Science cannot currently accomplish that.
The Human Body Is Built Around Tradeoffs
The human body is not a machine with independent parts that can be upgraded separately.
Its systems depend on one another.
Muscles require oxygen and nutrients delivered through the bloodstream. The heart must work harder when the body grows larger or operates at greater intensity. Bones and connective tissues must tolerate the additional forces produced by stronger muscles.
The body must also release heat.
Most of the energy used during intense physical activity does not become movement. Much of it becomes heat that must escape through the skin, breathing, circulation, and sweat.
Armor, helmets, heavy uniforms, equipment, humidity, and extreme temperatures make that process more difficult.
Making someone dramatically stronger without improving circulation, cooling, bone strength, joint durability, nutrition, and recovery could make that person less sustainable rather than more effective.
The body’s limits are not caused by one missing gene or one weak organ. They emerge from the entire system.
Genetic Engineering Is Not a Simple Upgrade
Gene editing is often presented as the most direct route to creating a super soldier.
The reality is much more complicated.
Traits such as strength, intelligence, endurance, reaction time, emotional control, and resistance to disease are influenced by many genes. They are also affected by nutrition, childhood development, illness, training, sleep, social conditions, and environmental exposure.
Changing one gene may influence multiple systems.
A modification intended to increase muscle growth could also affect the heart, metabolism, mobility, connective tissue, or long-term cancer risk. A change intended to strengthen immunity could increase the possibility of harmful inflammation or autoimmune disease.
Editing an adult body creates another challenge.
A treatment would need to reach vast numbers of cells spread throughout muscles, organs, blood, nerves, bones, and connective tissues. It would have to make the intended change consistently while avoiding harmful mutations and immune reactions.
Editing embryos would raise even more serious legal and ethical concerns because the changes could affect development and potentially pass to future generations.
NATO’s biotechnology and human-enhancement strategy recognizes that these technologies could influence defense and security, but it also emphasizes responsible development, human agency, safety, lawfulness, accountability, and long-term well-being.
The distance between editing a group of cells in a laboratory and safely redesigning an adult human being remains enormous.
Exoskeletons Are More Realistic Than Genetic Super Soldiers
Mechanical assistance offers a more realistic path toward improving physical performance.
An exoskeleton or wearable support system could help a service member carry equipment, reduce strain, stabilize joints, or perform repetitive physical tasks.
DARPA’s Warrior Web program explored a soft, lightweight undersuit intended to reduce fatigue and musculoskeletal injuries while supporting natural movement. Its goal was not to create an armored superhero. It was to help protect the wearer from the physical burden of demanding military activity.
That distinction matters.
A device that reduces strain can still provide significant military value even when it does not allow someone to lift a vehicle or run at extraordinary speed.
Exoskeletons also face practical problems.
Powered systems require energy. Batteries add weight and must be charged or replaced. Motors create heat and noise. Mechanical joints must align correctly with the wearer’s body.
The device must function in mud, water, dust, snow, rubble, forests, buildings, vehicles, and uneven terrain.
It must allow the wearer to run, climb, crawl, kneel, enter confined spaces, treat injuries, and move quickly under fire.
The system must also fail safely.
A service member cannot become trapped inside a disabled machine because its battery died or one joint malfunctioned.
For many missions, reducing equipment weight may remain more practical than adding a powered system that creates new maintenance and energy requirements.
Armor Cannot Make a Person Invulnerable
Modern body armor can stop certain ballistic threats and save lives.
It cannot provide complete protection from every weapon.
More armor usually means more weight, bulk, heat retention, and restricted movement. Covering additional areas of the body may protect against fragments or gunfire but make it harder to run, climb, crawl, aim, communicate, or enter vehicles.
DARPA’s Soldier Protection Systems program investigated lightweight materials and structures intended to improve protection from ballistic and blast threats. The program is now complete and its page remains available as a research reference.
Even advanced materials cannot eliminate every weakness.
Armor must contain openings and flexible sections around the neck, shoulders, arms, hips, and legs. Those areas are necessary for movement but are difficult to protect fully.
Protection against one type of threat may not perform equally well against another.
A system designed to stop fragments may not withstand a powerful rifle round. Armor effective against bullets may provide limited protection from blast pressure, fire, chemical exposure, drowning, falls, or vehicle impacts.
The realistic objective is to reduce risk—not to make the wearer indestructible.
Brain-Computer Interfaces Do Not Create Super Intelligence
Brain-computer interfaces may eventually help people interact with machines more directly.
DARPA’s Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology program explored high-performance, bidirectional brain-machine interfaces that would not require surgical implantation. Potential applications included controlling unmanned systems, interacting with computers, and assisting with complex military tasks.
That does not mean service members can currently control entire battlefields using thought alone.
The brain produces extremely complex patterns of electrical and chemical activity. Extracting a precise command from those signals is difficult, especially without implanted electrodes.
Signals weaken and scatter as they pass through brain tissue, the skull, and skin.
A practical military interface would also need to work while the user is moving, exhausted, stressed, injured, distracted, and surrounded by electronic interference.
The system would need to avoid misreading intentions or overwhelming the user with information.
Neural interfaces may eventually improve communication with machines. That is different from increasing intelligence itself.
A person may be able to direct a device more quickly without becoming more creative, knowledgeable, emotionally stable, or strategically capable.
Accelerated Learning Is More Plausible Than Downloaded Skills
Military researchers have also investigated whether neurotechnology could support faster training.
DARPA’s Targeted Neuroplasticity Training program studied noninvasive stimulation combined with instruction to determine whether certain skills could be learned more efficiently and retained longer. The program examined applications such as language learning, marksmanship, target discrimination, cryptography, and intelligence analysis.
This is far less dramatic than instantly downloading knowledge into the brain.
Learning still requires repetition, feedback, sleep, correction, experience, and practice.
Even when a person learns information quickly, they may not know how to apply it under pressure.
Military performance depends heavily on judgment.
A service member must determine which information matters, how reliable it is, and what action is appropriate in a rapidly changing situation.
The most useful cognitive enhancement may therefore come from improved training and decision support rather than an attempt to manufacture superhuman intelligence.
Drugs Cannot Safely Eliminate Sleep
Sleep places a major limit on military performance.
Service members sometimes operate for extended periods, and militaries have historically used stimulants or alertness-promoting medications under controlled circumstances.
Those substances do not remove the biological need for sleep.
They may help someone feel more awake temporarily, but sleep deprivation continues to affect memory, reaction time, emotional control, attention, judgment, and physical recovery.
That creates a dangerous problem.
A person may feel alert enough to continue while still making worse decisions.
Sleep also performs biological functions that a stimulant cannot replace. The brain and body use sleep for memory processing, hormonal regulation, immune function, tissue repair, and metabolic recovery.
A true sleepless super soldier would require a fundamentally different nervous system or a safe method of completing the restorative functions of sleep while remaining active.
Science does not currently know how to do that.
This is why the Army’s current readiness system includes sleep as a core performance domain rather than treating rest as an obstacle to be eliminated.
Rapid Healing Creates Serious Biological Risks
Fictional super soldiers often recover from gunshot wounds, broken bones, burns, and damaged organs in a matter of hours or days.
Human healing requires coordinated inflammation, immune activity, cell division, blood-vessel growth, scar formation, collagen production, and tissue remodeling.
Those processes take time.
Accelerating cell growth too aggressively could increase the risk of abnormal tissue development or cancer. Suppressing inflammation might reduce discomfort while also interfering with infection control and repair.
Different tissues also heal differently.
Skin, bone, nerves, cartilage, muscle, tendons, and internal organs do not respond to injury through one universal process.
Military medicine has greatly improved survival through bleeding control, surgery, evacuation, rehabilitation, prosthetics, infection prevention, and trauma care.
Those advances can save a wounded person and improve recovery.
They do not provide instant regeneration.
The more realistic objective is to prevent injury, stabilize wounds quickly, preserve function, and improve long-term rehabilitation.
Pain Cannot Simply Be Switched Off
Pain may appear to be a weakness in combat, but it serves an important protective function.
It warns the body about burns, fractures, torn muscles, damaged joints, internal injury, and other threats.
A person who could not feel pain might continue running on a fractured leg, worsen a spinal injury, or fail to recognize serious internal bleeding.
Eliminating pain without repairing the underlying damage could make an injury more severe.
Effective military medicine may control overwhelming pain while preserving enough awareness for the patient and medical personnel to recognize danger.
That is different from producing someone who can ignore any wound without consequence.
Pain is not merely an inconvenience. It is part of the body’s warning system.
The Immune System Cannot Be Made Universally Powerful
A super soldier is often imagined as resistant to disease, toxins, radiation, and biological weapons.
The immune system does not operate through a simple strength setting.
An overly active immune response can damage healthy tissue. Allergies, autoimmune diseases, and dangerous inflammatory reactions show that more immune activity is not always better.
Different threats also require different defenses.
Viruses, bacteria, fungi, toxins, radiation, and chemical agents harm the body through different mechanisms. Improving resistance to one threat may provide little protection from another.
A universally protected immune system would need to identify every possible danger rapidly while never attacking healthy cells or causing destructive inflammation.
No known biological system can perform that task perfectly.
Military protection therefore relies on multiple layers: vaccines, sanitation, detection systems, protective equipment, surveillance, diagnostics, medical treatment, and operational planning.
Those measures are less dramatic than biological invulnerability, but they are far more practical.
Heat May Be One of the Greatest Barriers
Any attempt to increase physical power must address heat.
Muscle activity produces large amounts of heat. The harder the body works, the more heat it must release.
Military equipment makes cooling difficult.
Body armor, helmets, communications equipment, weapons, protective clothing, and carried supplies can trap heat and interfere with evaporation.
A powered exoskeleton could add even more heat through batteries, motors, and electronics.
Cooling equipment would require additional energy and weight.
A person capable of extraordinary short-term strength could still become ineffective if the body overheats after several minutes.
Superhuman performance would require not only stronger muscles but also a vastly improved cooling system.
Human biology does not offer an easy way to achieve that safely.
Greater Performance Would Require More Food and Water
Higher physical output requires greater energy input.
A larger, stronger, and faster body would need additional calories, oxygen, water, electrolytes, and nutrients.
Military operations already depend on complicated supply systems.
Food and water add weight. They must be transported, stored, protected, and distributed.
A supposedly enhanced soldier who consumes far more resources could create a logistical disadvantage.
The same problem applies to mechanical enhancement.
Batteries, spare parts, charging systems, software support, maintenance tools, and trained technicians become part of the supply chain.
A technology that provides impressive performance for a brief demonstration may be unsuitable for sustained deployment.
Military effectiveness depends on what can be supported repeatedly—not simply what can be achieved once in a controlled test.
Battlefield Technology Must Work Outside the Laboratory
Military technology must survive conditions that are difficult to reproduce fully in a laboratory.
A device may work well on a treadmill or flat test course but fail when exposed to saltwater, sand, freezing temperatures, heavy rain, dust, blast shock, electronic interference, or repeated impact.
It must also accommodate different bodies.
Service members differ in height, weight, limb length, strength, metabolism, health history, and previous injuries.
A treatment or wearable device that performs well for one individual may be ineffective or harmful for another.
Military systems must also be reliable across large groups of people.
A prototype that works under carefully controlled conditions is not the same as equipment that can be issued, maintained, transported, repaired, and used across thousands of personnel.
This gap between a scientific demonstration and operational readiness explains why apparently promising technologies can take years to enter service—or never reach widespread use.
Long-Term Health Risks Could Outlast Military Service
An enhancement may appear successful during a deployment while causing medical problems years later.
Hormones, stimulants, implants, gene therapies, neural devices, and experimental biological treatments could potentially affect fertility, heart function, cancer risk, sleep, mood, cognition, or neurological health.
The military would remain responsible for the consequences.
Enhanced personnel could require specialized monitoring and treatment long after leaving active duty.
Veterans might enter civilian healthcare systems that lack the expertise or authority to manage classified or experimental technologies.
A device might need maintenance after the original manufacturer no longer supports it.
A biological intervention could produce complications decades after exposure.
Any system that improves short-term performance while creating lifelong disability would be strategically damaging as well as ethically unacceptable.
Consent Is Complicated in a Military Organization
Military service involves lawful orders, strict hierarchy, career competition, and expectations that differ from ordinary employment.
That makes informed consent especially complicated.
A service member may technically agree to an experimental enhancement while believing that refusal could damage promotion prospects, unit standing, assignment opportunities, or professional reputation.
More invasive technologies would create difficult questions.
Could a service member later request that an implant be removed? Who would own the biological and neural data collected by the device? What would happen if the enhancement altered personality, fertility, or emotional control?
Would participation remain voluntary after a unit had reorganized around the enhanced capability?
NATO’s biotechnology and human-enhancement strategy specifically recognizes the importance of human agency, informed consent, safety, accountability, legal compliance, and long-term personnel well-being.
These concerns are not secondary.
A military technology cannot be considered successful solely because it increases performance.
Enhancement Could Divide the Force
Major enhancements could create new divisions between enhanced and unenhanced personnel.
Those who received enhancements might be assigned more dangerous missions or face expectations that ordinary service members would not.
They could receive different career opportunities, medical classifications, training requirements, and retirement obligations.
Unequal access might also create resentment or stigma.
Enhanced veterans could face difficulties in civilian employment if their modifications required continued monitoring or restricted disclosure.
Disability systems would need to determine whether long-term complications were service connected.
Military identity might become linked not only to rank, occupation, or unit, but also to biological or technological status.
These consequences would affect the institution far beyond the immediate battlefield advantage.
Adversaries Would Develop Countermeasures
A super-soldier program would not remain a one-sided advantage.
Other nations would attempt to copy the technology, steal it, disrupt it, or develop weapons designed specifically to defeat it.
A powered suit might be vulnerable to electronic warfare, cyberattack, electromagnetic disruption, or attacks on its energy supply.
A biological enhancement could create medical vulnerabilities that an adversary might exploit.
An opponent might avoid direct confrontation and instead use drones, artillery, autonomous weapons, chemical agents, or environmental hazards that physical strength cannot overcome.
Enhancement could also encourage an international arms race in which governments accept increasingly serious medical and ethical risks because they fear falling behind.
NATO has publicly acknowledged both the defensive opportunities and the strategic risks associated with biotechnology and human-enhancement technologies.
The important question is not only whether enhancement can be developed.
It is whether pursuing it creates a more secure or more unstable world.
Machines May Reduce the Need to Redesign Human Biology
The military may not need biologically superhuman personnel if machines can perform the most dangerous or physically demanding tasks.
Robots, drones, autonomous vehicles, sensors, satellites, and artificial-intelligence systems can extend human reach without permanently altering the person.
A service member supported by accurate intelligence, unmanned systems, reliable communications, and advanced protective equipment may be far more effective than a physically enhanced individual operating alone.
Machines can also be designed for environments that are particularly dangerous to the human body.
They can enter contaminated areas, carry heavy loads, remain in the air for long periods, or conduct surveillance without exposing personnel directly.
The future battlefield may therefore depend less on creating superhuman bodies and more on improving cooperation between humans and machines.
Teams Matter More Than Individual Heroes
Military operations are collective.
They depend on logistics, intelligence, leadership, training, maintenance, communication, medical support, transportation, planning, and trust.
One unusually capable person cannot replace an effective organization.
A physically enhanced soldier still needs ammunition, information, teammates, transportation, medical care, and strategic direction.
A person who is extraordinarily strong but unable to communicate, follow plans, or work within a unit may be less useful than an ordinary service member who is disciplined, reliable, and well trained.
Fiction focuses on exceptional individuals because they make compelling characters.
Real military effectiveness comes from systems and teams capable of coordinating action over time.
The Closest Future Version Will Probably Be Technological
Future military personnel may become significantly more capable without becoming biologically superhuman.
They may wear lighter protective equipment, use augmented-reality displays, control uncrewed systems, receive AI-assisted information, and carry sensors that monitor fatigue, hydration, temperature, and injury risk.
Soft exosuits may reduce strain. Neural interfaces may improve specific forms of human-machine interaction. Medical advances may improve recovery and rehabilitation.
Training may become more personalized through data analysis and simulation.
These technologies will probably arrive gradually rather than through one dramatic breakthrough.
The future service member may appear enhanced because many systems work together.
That is different from possessing extraordinary natural strength, instant healing, unlimited endurance, or invulnerability.
New To Education and Responsible Technology Reporting
Discussions about super soldiers often move between conspiracy theories and science-fiction excitement.
The publicly documented reality is more complex.
Military organizations have researched biotechnology, human performance, neurotechnology, exosuits, protective materials, robotics, artificial intelligence, and medical resilience.
Those efforts remain constrained by biology, engineering, ethics, law, cost, safety, logistics, and long-term health.
A successful laboratory experiment is not automatically an operational military system.
A program’s research goal is not proof that the goal was achieved.
A technology that improves one measure of performance may create new weaknesses elsewhere.
Understanding those distinctions is essential when evaluating claims about future warfare and human enhancement.
Key Takeaways
Modern militaries already enhance human performance through training, nutrition, sleep programs, medicine, protective equipment, sensors, communications, robotics, and artificial intelligence.
Public defense research has explored soft exosuits, advanced armor, neural interfaces, accelerated training, biotechnology, and human-machine teaming.
Human abilities such as strength, intelligence, endurance, healing, and resilience depend on many interconnected systems.
Improving one trait may create additional risks involving heat, energy consumption, joint damage, cardiovascular strain, judgment, metabolism, or long-term health.
Gene editing cannot currently produce a safe, predictable adult super soldier.
Exoskeletons remain limited by power, weight, mobility, maintenance, heat, and reliability.
Brain-computer interfaces may improve communication with machines, but they do not create superhuman intelligence.
Drugs can temporarily reduce fatigue but cannot safely eliminate the biological need for sleep.
Military enhancement also raises serious questions involving informed consent, privacy, long-term healthcare, inequality, and international arms races.
The most realistic future is a healthy and highly trained service member supported by better equipment, AI, robotics, medical care, and effective teammates.
FAQ
Do super soldiers currently exist?
There is no credible public evidence that any military possesses comic-book-style genetically engineered or invulnerable soldiers.
Are militaries researching human enhancement?
Yes. Public research has examined human performance, biotechnology, brain-machine interfaces, injury prevention, exosuits, advanced armor, medical recovery, and human-machine cooperation.
Could gene editing make someone much stronger?
Gene editing may eventually influence specific biological traits, but strength depends on many interconnected systems. Safe, predictable, whole-body enhancement remains far beyond current capabilities.
Can exoskeletons provide super strength?
Wearable systems may help users carry loads or reduce physical strain. They remain limited by batteries, weight, heat, mobility, reliability, and maintenance requirements.
Can soldiers learn skills instantly through brain technology?
No. Neurotechnology may eventually improve some forms of training, but learning still requires practice, feedback, repetition, sleep, and experience.
Could drugs eliminate the need for sleep?
No. Some substances may temporarily increase alertness, but they do not replace the biological functions of sleep.
Why can scientists not make soldiers heal instantly?
Healing depends on complicated cellular and immune processes. Accelerating those processes too aggressively could create scarring, abnormal tissue growth, infection risks, or cancer.
Would removing pain make someone more effective?
Not necessarily. Pain warns the body about injury. Removing it could cause a person to worsen fractures, burns, internal injuries, or tissue damage.
Are brain-computer interfaces being developed for military applications?
Yes. Public military research has explored both surgical and nonsurgical neural interfaces, but advanced operational capabilities remain limited and experimental.
What will the closest real version of a super soldier look like?
The most realistic version will be a well-trained person supported by advanced armor, sensors, AI, drones, medical monitoring, robotics, communications, and wearable assistance.
Final Thoughts
We still do not have super soldiers because the human body cannot be upgraded one ability at a time without affecting the rest of the system.
Greater strength creates additional demands on bones, joints, circulation, energy production, and cooling.
Faster learning does not automatically create better judgment.
Reduced pain may hide serious injuries.
Greater immune activity can harm healthy tissue.
Faster healing could increase abnormal cell growth.
Mechanical systems create their own burdens involving batteries, heat, maintenance, weight, reliability, and logistics.
Science will continue improving human performance.
The most meaningful advances may involve preventing injuries, reducing fatigue, supporting recovery, improving training, carrying less weight, and making better decisions.
That future is less dramatic than fiction.
It is also more realistic and potentially more valuable.
The most capable future soldier will probably not be a genetically engineered superhero.
It will be a healthy, highly trained person supported by reliable technology, strong leadership, effective teammates, responsible medical care, and a military system that understands both the potential and the limits of human enhancement.
Support New To Education
New To Education publishes independent reporting and analysis on science, military technology, biotechnology, artificial intelligence, health, education, and the policies shaping the future.
Readers can support this work by sharing our articles, joining the New To Education community, subscribing to updates, exploring our educational and professional services, and contributing through the support options available on our website.
Related Articles
Why We Still Do Not Have Flying Cars
https://www.newtoeducation.com/view-blog/why-we-still-do-not-have-flying-cars-6a6a018874abd
U.S. Air Force Turns to Commercial Technology for the Next Generation of Uncrewed Aircraft
https://www.newtoeducation.com/view-blog/us-air-force-turns-to-commercial-technology-for-the-next-generation-of-uncrewed-aircraft-6a50a83041494
Sources
U.S. Army — Holistic Health and Fitness
https://h2f.army.mil/
U.S. Army — H2F in the News
https://h2f.army.mil/H2F-in-the-News/
DARPA — Warrior Web
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/warrior-web
DARPA — Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/next-generation-nonsurgical-neurotechnology
DARPA — Targeted Neuroplasticity Training
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/targeted-neuroplasticity-training
DARPA — Soldier Protection Systems
https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/soldier-protection-systems
NATO — Biotechnology and Human Enhancement Technologies Strategy
https://www.nato.int/en/about-us/official-texts-and-resources/official-texts/2024/04/12/summary-of-natos-biotechnology-and-human-enhancement-technologies-strategy
